| From: |
Guidelines for
Defining Public Health Research & Public Health Non-Research, rev.
1-4-99. Published by the CDC. Adapted liberally.
|
| Note: |
this information was
taken directly from CDC guidelines and does not incorporate state
regulations or SKCDPH policies/philosophy. |
This appendix is broken down into four
categories: Attributes of Research; Surveillance; Emergency Responses and Evaluation.
Attributes of Research
| Considerations |
Research |
Public Health
Activities/Non-Research |
| Primary intent of
activity |
To generate or
contribute to generalizable knowledge(1) to
improve public health practice by a systematic investigation,
including research development. |
To prevent or control
disease or injury and improve health or to improve a public health
program or service. In some cases this knowledge may be
generalizable. |
| Who benefits from
study results? |
May or may not include
study participants, but always extend beyond study participants,
usually to society |
Clients participating
in SKCDPH programs or for controlling a health problem in the
population from which the information is generated. |
| Data Collection
Purpose |
Exceeds requirements
for care of the study participants or extends beyond the scope of
the activity |
Data needed to access
and/or improve the program or service, the health of the
participants or the participants' community |
| How collected |
Under systematic
procedures that reduce bias, allowing it to be applied to
populations and settings different from the ones from which it was
collected |
Knowledge generated
does not extend beyond the scope of the activity |
| Role of experimental
studies |
Can be included |
Would never include |
| Does subsequent
analysis of PHI undertaken generate or contribute to generalizable
knowledge? |
Classify as research |
It may start out in
this category but becomes research that requires IRB review when it
"crosses over" into generalizable knowledge. |
| Does the project
include multiple components and at least one is designed to generate
generalizable knowledge? |
Classify as research |
The entire project
becomes research when this occurs |
Items that have no
bearing on how a study is categorized:
- Publication of Findings
- Methodological Design
- Subject Selection
- Hypothesis testing/ generating
|
|
|
Surveillance
| Considerations |
Research |
Public Health
Activities/Non-Research |
| A method for public
health data collection |
Involves collection &
analysis of health related data conducted either to generate
knowledge that is applicable to other populations and settings that
the ones from which the data were collected or to contribute to new
knowledge about the health condition. |
Involves regular,
ongoing collection and analysis or health related data conducted to
monitor frequency & distribution in the population:
- Ability to invoke public health mechanisms to prevent or
control disease or injury in response to an event
|
| Intent |
To generalize
generalizable knowledge |
To prevent or control
disease or injury in a defined population by producing information
about the population from whom the data were collected. |
| Data Use |
Beyond SKCDPH,
literature |
Management of public
health programs |
| Attributes Generally
Found |
In research design
proposal |
In state statute or
regulation where the intent of the activity, its purposes, and uses
of the data are specified. Need to give SKCDPH specific examples |
| Subject selection |
Design |
Via passive reporting
systems |
| Hypothesis testing |
Yes. Includes
longitudinal data collection systems that allows for hypothesis
testing |
No |
| Scope |
Broad. Etiologic
analysis is likely to fall in this category. |
Generally, lawful
state disease reporting, monitoring requirements and other data
collection activities conducted under state statute. When data
collection extends beyond this, it is not automatically considered
non-research. |
Emergency Responses
| Purpose |
Research |
Public Health
Activities/Non-Research |
| To identify,
characterize and solve an immediate health problem and the knowledge
gained will directly benefit those involved in the investigation or
their communities |
May become research
when the study or a component of it has:
- samples which are stored for future use intended to create
generalizable knowledge
- additional analyses are conducted beyond those needed to solve
the immediate health problem
This is almost always research when:
- investigational new drugs are used or drugs are used off-label
- medical devices are investigational or (?? Off-label apply
here)
This is research when:
- there is a systematic investigation of a non-standard
intervention
- there is a systematic comparison of standard interventions
|
These activities tend
to fall into this category. |
Evaluation or Program Evaluation
| Definitions |
Research |
Public Health
Activities/Non-Research |
| Evaluations (broad in
meaning) refer to the systematic use of scientific methods to
measure efficacy, implementation, utility and so on of a program in
its entirety or its components. |
Can be research when
conditions are met. |
|
| Program Evaluations --
an essential organizational practice in public health using a
systematic approach to improve and account for public health
actions. These are a subset of evaluations. |
|
Is not considered
"research" |
| Formative Evaluation
-- data collection activities that occur prior to the implementation
of an intervention, service or program |
If conducted prior to
implementing a new, modified or previously untested intervention |
If conducted to
provide information on how to tailor a proven-effective
intervention, service or program in a specific setting or context |
| Purpose |
- To test new, modified or previously untested intervention,
service, or program to determine whether it is effective
- Systematic comparison of standard or non-standard
interventions in an experimental-type design
Note: in both cases the intent is to generate new knowledge or
contribute to knowledge in the scientific literature and to apply
this knowledge to other sites or populations. |
When used as a
management tool to monitor and improve the program:
- Is often a component of an on-going, regular program
- Information is not generalizable beyond the individual program
- Provides immediate benefit for clients
- Evaluations are not on anything experimental or new (they are
known from empirical data or through consensus to be effective)
|
Further notes
There are some
projects that do not fit easily into the categories described above, so the primary intent and elements of the project must be taken into
consideration. See the table entitled "Attributes of Research" for
guidance. An example would be when a public health department, under its
public health authority provides an untested intervention in an outbreak
situation. An evaluation component is then added. In this example,
because the intervention and evaluation activities are undertaken with
different intentions and are separable, the intervention activities are
not research but the evaluation activities are research.
(1) Generalizable
knowledge means new information that has relevance beyond the
population or program from which it was collected, or information that
is added to the scientific literature. This does not refer to the
statistical concept of population estimation or to the traditional
public health method of collecting information from a sample to
understand health in the population from which the sample came.
|