PHDSC LogoPHDSC Graphic Banner
Home Join the PHDSC ListServ Subscription Site Map Contact Us
 
Module 7 Preview Page

 

Tutorial Module 7: Public Health Relevant Data Standards Development or Implementation efforts

Efforts to identify public health information needs, and develop and adopt data standards to address them are surfacing at national, state and local levels. Given increased attention to and support of public health in light of recent threats to homeland security, the time is now and urgent for public health to move to electronic data standards, to recognize and address emerging threats, and to establish a foundation for improved public health practice. In addition, public health should take advantage of the opportunities for action through unprecedented advancements in information technology and computer science. (See Module 8 for more information about public health informatics.)

In this module, national and state examples of standards development and implementation efforts or systems relying on data standards are described. National examples relevant to recent public health discussion are highlighted, but are not exclusive of national initiatives (e.g., the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Public Health Information Network efforts and the Public Health Data Standards Consortium's Health Care Service: Data Reporting guide). Each example includes an explanation of why the standard or system is relevant to public health, the types of standards employed and the status of standards adoption or implementation. Data standards types include, but are not limited to, terminology standards (e.g., code sets, classification systems), message format standards (e.g., those mandated under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 for the efficient exchange of electronic billing data), and data capture forms (e.g., the Uniform Bill data collection form used by hospitals). (See Module 5 for more information on types of data standards.) In addition, implementation guides provide standardized data requirements and content for all users of a particular data standard to ensure consistency in implementation.

National Examples State Example

National Examples

North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR)

Description Photo: Computer MouseThe North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Inc. (NAACCR), is a professional organization that develops and promotes uniform data standards for cancer registration; provides education and training; certifies population-based registries; aggregates and publishes data from central cancer registries; and promotes the use of cancer surveillance data and systems for cancer control and epidemiologic research, public health programs, and patient care to reduce the burden of cancer in North America.(1)
Public Health Relevance Cancer registries are patient and disease oriented databases of information about cancer. They provide public health organizations with health statistics and epidemiological and surveillance data about the incidence and treatment of cancer.(2)
Type of Data Standards Employed Types of data standards which NAACCR develops and promotes include:
  • Standard record layout and edit protocols for exchange of registry data;

  • HL-7 message format standards for clinical information;

  • Terminology standards including a data dictionary, use of LOINC codes, evaluation of SNOMED; and

  • Standards for completeness, quality, management and analysis of data.

Status of Adoption Adherence to NAACCR standards by states is voluntary but many hospitals participate in the accreditation program for cancer hospitals maintained by the American College of Surgeons. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program of the National Cancer Institute and the CDC’s National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) (together SEER and NPCR programs collect data for the entire U.S. population) require the collection of standard data items and codes that are consistent with NAACCR standards.(3)
Link North American Association of Central Cancer Registries

The Health Care Service: Data Reporting Guide

Description Photo: Man on phone at computerThe Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) mandates that the United States adopt national uniform standards for electronic transactions related to health insurance enrollment, eligibility, health care encounters and health care claims, heath care payment and remittance advice, claims status, referral certification and authorization, and premium payments. In addition, HIPAA mandates standard code sets that must be used in these transactions. Classification systems are included in the named national code sets.

HIPAA names specific implementation guides to provide the compliance details. These implementation guides specify the data elements required, definitions of data elements, technical transactions for transmission of the data, named external code sources, acceptable internal code values, as well as usage notes for each data element.(4)

While public health is not mandated under HIPAA to adopt standards for electronic health care transactions, except as payers and providers, the Public Health Data Standards Consortium (PHDSC) member organizations agreed that it made good sense adopting the same standards as named in HIPAA, where appropriate. (See Module 6 for the rationale for moving to standards in public health.) In cooperation with the Standards Development Organizations (SDOs) and the Data Content Committees (DCCs) named in HIPAA, the Consortium developed an implementation guide for public health reporting of health encounters. “The Health Care Service: Data Reporting Guide” uses a subset of the same standard (837) used by HIPAA covered entities to submit health care encounters and health claims. This implementation guide includes data elements beyond those that are necessary for billing purposes, which are designated in the implementation guides named in the HIPAA Transactions and Codes Final Rule. It is the first national implementation guide that specifically addresses the information needs of public health for encounter data, including specifications for data elements such as race and ethnicity, county codes, and a limited set of clinical data elements.

Public Health Relevance “The Health Care Service: Data Reporting Guide” will facilitate public health’s ability to communicate with clinical care delivery systems, especially to address data needs that rely on encounter data (e.g., hospital discharge data systems).
Type of Data Standards Employed “The Health Care Service: Data Reporting Guide” uses the ANSI ASC X12 message format standards for electronic data interchange (EDI). This guide uses the health care claims standard (837) which was developed by the ANSI ASC X12 insurance subcommittee (N).

The Health Care Service: Data Reporting Guide primarily uses the UB data content standards maintained by the National Uniform Billing Committee (NUBC).

Status of Adoption “The Health Care Service: Data Reporting Guide” is available on the Washington Publishing Company Web site. The guide number is 004050X156.

The New York State discharge data system (SPARCS) utilized this guide in the development of their state mandated emergency department data collection system. System design documentation based on the "Health Care Service: Data Reporting Guide" is available on the SPARCS Web site.

Links Public Health Data Standards Consortium
Washington Publishing Company

Public Health Information Network (PHIN)*

Description A cross-cutting and unifying framework is needed to better monitor diverse data streams for early detection of public health issues and emergencies. The Public Health Information Network (PHIN) is this framework. Through defined data and vocabulary standards and strong collaborative relationships, the Public Health Information Network will enable consistent exchange of response, health, and disease tracking data between public health partners. PHIN uses existing systems for early detection (BioSense), surveillance (NEDSS), secure communication (Epi-X), analysis and interpretation, information dissemination (CDC Website, HAN), vocabulary services and public health response functions, including lab, outbreak and vaccine management and administration.(5) Ensuring the security of this information is also critical as is the ability of the network to work reliably in times of national crisis. PHIN is composed of five key components: detection and monitoring, data analysis, knowledge management, alerting and response:
  • Detection and monitoring supports disease and threat tracking as well as national health status indicators.

  • Data analysis facilitates real-time evaluation of live data feeds transforming data into useful information for partners at all levels of public health.

  • Information resources and knowledge management provides reference resources, distance learning and decision support.

  • Alerting and communications platforms transmit emergency alerts, routine professional discussions and collaborative activities.

  • Response provides management support around guidelines, recommendations, vaccination, etc.

Creating a strong network that continues to define shared data standards to support the exchange of key health data is critical for a more effective and response-oriented public health system. The Public Health Information Network will serve as the framework supporting this new system, a system better positioned to respond to the changing needs of public health and consequently the nation.

Public Health Relevance A prompt and authoritative response to public health issues and emergencies large and small is a significant part of what defines the CDC. These emergencies can range from outbreaks aboard cruise ships to investigating sick buildings to monitoring the global AIDS situation. However, the anthrax crisis highlighted a gap in the nation’s ability to adequately identify a broader spectrum of possible threats. Ensuring clinical, local, state and federal agencies can seamlessly exchange health–related data is an essential step toward addressing this gap.

Currently there are multiple systems in place that support communications for public health labs, the clinical community, and state and local health departments. Each has demonstrated the importance of being able to exchange health information. However, many of these systems operate in isolation, not capitalizing on the potential for a cross-fertilization of data exchange. The Public Health Information Network seeks to leverage those systems and capitalize on that potential.

Type of Data Standards Employed The Public Health Information Network will extend the work that has been done in the area of infectious disease surveillance under the National Electronic Disease Surveillance System (NEDSS). The Public Health Conceptual Data Model that was developed as part of the NEDSS architecture will be enhanced as the Public Health Domain Information Model to include concepts in areas such as environmental health, adverse medical event reporting, and other areas outside of infectious diseases that are not adequately expressed in the current version of the data model. The association with the HL7 Reference Information Model (RIM) will be maintained and the development of HL7 messages for data and information exchange will continue to be leveraged. The use of standard vocabularies such as LOINC and SNOMED will be enhanced through the use of other industry standard vocabularies that may be relevant in other public health domains as the Public Health Domain Information Model is extended. This will continue to provide consistency in the expression of the data and the semantics of the data elements which will facilitate data aggregation and analysis from multiple diverse sources, since the meaning of the data contents will be the same across multiple systems.
Status of Adoption Since the Public Health Information Network will leverage and extend the work that has already been done in developing the NEDSS architecture, there will be a foundation already in place from which to build the functional and architectural components that are expressed in this initiative. To date, all states have received funding for assessment activities under NEDSS and 36 health jurisdictions have received funding for development efforts. This has been further enhanced under the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) emergency preparedness and bioterrorism response initiative, which has adopted the Public Health Information Network standards, and which provided funding to 62 state, territory and large metropolitan health jurisdictions in 2002. Continued funding is anticipated for this initiative and the public health vendor community is beginning to inquire about this architecture with an eye toward developing products in support of public health activities that are in compliance with the architectural standards. This type of partnership between public health and the vendor community in promulgating all aspects of this architecture can only support the rapid evolution of interoperable public health systems and the improvement in the capacity of public health to response to all types of public health events.
 

* Information about the Public Health Information Network was provided via electronic mail by John Teeter, Associate Director, Information Technology Architecture, Information Resources Management Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. February 26, 2003.

 

“On September 11, 2002, within hours of terrorist attacks in New York City and Washington, DC, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued a health alert to public health authorities in all 50 states. The alert, sent by e-mail and fax, recommended that they heighten surveillance for any unusual disease occurrence or increased numbers of illnesses that might be associated with the attacks. CDC accomplished this nationwide notification by using the Health Alert Network (HAN) States received notification in an average of six minutes. Twenty-four states then used their own statewide Health Alert Networks to quickly forward the alert to local public health officials…. State and local health officials subsequently broadcasted information to hospitals, emergency departments, urgent care facilities, community health nurses, hospital and private laboratories, infection control practitioners, law enforcement agencies, and water suppliers.”

O’Carroll, Patrick. Halverson, Paul. Jones, Deborah. Baker, Edward. “The Health Alert Network in Action.” Northwest Public Health. University of Washington School of Public Health and Community Medicine. Spring/Summer 2002.

 

Health Alert Network

Description Photo: Binary NumbersOriginating in October 1998, the Health Alert Network is designed to build preparedness and response capacity at the local health department level in partnership with colleagues at the state departments of health. Funding for HAN supports connections to the Internet, training of the public health workforce via distance learning systems (satellite, Internet, or both), and the capacity to send urgent health alerts to local agencies and selected groups via information broadcast technologies (e.g., broadcast fax services, autodialing).

In many states and localities, while HAN began as an infrastructure to increase agency preparedness to respond to a public health emergency, it has evolved into an integrated information and communications system platform for all day to day operations and programs. For example, national disease surveillance and electronic laboratory reporting (through NEDSS) runs on the HAN platform.

Public Health Relevance HAN increases local and state public health agency preparedness to respond to a public health emergency. HAN is a nationwide, integrated information and communications system serving as a platform for distribution of health alerts, dissemination of prevention guidelines and other information, and distance learning, as well as supporting CDCs bioterrorism and related initiatives.(6)
Type of Data Standards Employed The Health Alert Network is providing local health departments with the infrastructure and capacity as well as networking relationships with the state health departments to eventually access and share data electronically. It is based on three core technical capacities: robust electronic communications capacity; capacity to receive distance-learning offerings; and capacity to receive and broadcast urgent health alerts.(7) HAN is a portal through which standards-based systems such as NEDSS can run.
Status of Adoption CDC is providing HAN funding and technical assistance to the following recipients:
  • All 50 state health agencies, the District of Columbia;

  • Eight territories;

  • Two-thirds of the nation’s counties;

  • Health organizations and major hospital networks;

  • Three metropolitan health departments (Chicago, County of Los Angeles Department of Health Services, and New York City);

  • Five local exemplar centers for public health preparedness (DeKalb County Board of Health, Georgia; Monroe County Health Department, New York; and Denver Health/Denver Public Health, Colorado; Westchester County Health Department, New York; Lawrence Douglas County, Kansas); and

  • Fourteen academic and seven specialty academic centers for public health preparedness.(8, 9)

With the inauguration of the Public Health Information Network (PHIN) in 2003 by CDC PHIN serves as the umbrella for the Health Alert Network (HAN), one of its many systems working to achieve the goal of an integrated public health system.

Links Health Alert Network (HAN)

National Electronic Disease Surveillance System (NEDSS) Initiative

Description Photo: Medical Staff Doing PaperworkThe vision of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) National Electronic Disease Surveillance System (NEDSS) Initiative (NEDSS) is to have integrated surveillance systems that can transfer appropriate public health, laboratory, and clinical data efficiently and securely over the Internet.(10) The NEDSS initiative is made up of the NEDSS System Architecture, the NEDSS Base System, and NEDSS Electronic Laboratory Reporting System. To initiate implementation of NEDSS, states have received funds to either develop their own systems using specified NEDSS System Architecture and standards, or to adopt all or a portion of the CDC-developed NEDSS Base System.(11)

The NEDSS System Architecture electronically integrates and links together several types of surveillance systems with the use of standard data formats; a communications infrastructure built on principles of public health informatics; and agreements on data access, sharing and confidentiality.(12) The Public Health Conceptual Data Model (PHCDM) is a major component of the NEDSS data architecture standards. The purpose of PHCDM is to document information needs of public health so that the CDC, in collaboration with state and local health departments, can establish data standards for public health, collaborate with national health informatics standards setting bodies to define standards for exchange of information, and construct computerized systems that conform to established standards for use in the management of data relevant to public health.(13)

Data expressions are further defined in the Public Health Logical Data Model which provides guidance on how the data concepts captured in the Public Health Conceptual Data Model can be implemented.

NEDSS is based on the following principles:

  • Utilization of industry standards;

  • Reliance on off-the-shelf software;

  • Internet-based secure transmission of data;

  • A common "look and feel" of systems;

  • Common reporting requirements; and

  • No requirement for specific software use.(14)

NEDSS System Architecture is designed to integrate and replace several current CDC surveillance systems, including the National Electronic Telecommunications System for Surveillance (NETSS), the HIV/AIDS reporting system, the vaccine preventable diseases and systems for tuberculosis (TB) and infectious diseases.(15)

The NEDSS Base System is a complete implementation of the NEDSS architecture and standards that is made available to states as an operational system. It is a modular platform that can be customized to meet state and program area data needs as well as provide a secure, accurate and efficient way for collecting and processing data needed at the national level.(16) Currently the modules are designed to provide functionality for surveillance purposes. In the future, the NEDSS Base System will be expanded to include modules that support common public health functions beyond surveillance. The NEDSS Base System is developed by an experienced software engineering company, Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC), in consultation with the CDC and state partners.

Both NEDSS and the NEDSS Base System have electronic laboratory reporting (ELR) functionality. ELR is designed to provide secure, automated and electronic communication for reportable conditions between participating state departments of health, the CDC, and external NEDSS trading partners using national standards for electronic messaging.(17) ELR reduces the reporting burden for clinical laboratories and minimizes data entry for public health.

Public Health Relevance NEDSS is designed to address the limitations of current surveillance systems which include:(18)
  • Multiple, incompatible, disease specific systems that currently exist;
  • Incomplete, inconsistently expressed and delayed data;
  • Burden on health care system to report disease;
  • Overwhelming volume of data to be managed by health departments; and
  • Lack of state-of-the-art information technology.

NEDSS will revolutionize public health by gathering and analyzing information quickly and accurately. NEDSS will help to improve the nation's ability to identify and track emerging infectious diseases and potential bioterrorism attacks as well as to investigate outbreaks and monitor disease trends.(19)

Type of Data Standards Employed NEDSS relies on several types of data standards:
  • Uniform data capture standards;

  • Message format standards (e.g., HL-7) for electronic data interchange (EDI) of disease surveillance and laboratory data; XML data exchange;

  • Terminology standards (e.g., LOINC, SNOMED)

  • Security standards.

Status of Adoption In FY 2000, the CDC created NEDSS with $20 million made available for this purpose. Approximately $10 million was used to set up the necessary CDC infrastructure, such as training, hardware, and software for the system. The remainder was awarded to states to begin development. To date, all states have received funds for NEDSS assessment and planning activities. In October 2002, Version 1.0 of the NEDSS Base System was released in several states. Currently Nebraska and South Carolina are using Version 1.02 of the Base System. Tennessee, Louisiana, Virginia, Indiana and Texas are in various stages of deployment. At this time, Version 1.1 of the NEDSS Base System is being deployed. See Exhibit 1 for states that are implementing and installing the NEDSS Base System.(20) With the inauguration of the Public Health Information Network (PHIN) in 2003 by CDC, PHIN serves as the umbrella for continued work developing and deploying the NEDSS.
Link National Electronic Disease Surveillance System

Exhibit 1: NEDSS Base System Sites, 2003

Exhibit 1: US Map showing NEDSS Base System Sites, 2003

Source: PHIN Brochure-National Electronic Disease Surveillance System (NEDSS) Base System (NBS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention accessed online 11-13-03 at http://www.cdc.gov/phin/components/index.htm

State Example

“A dedicated lead team of state, regional, local public health staff, and tribal representatives developed the Secure Public Health Electronic Record Environment (SPHERE). The vision of the SPHERE Lead Team was to design a state-of-the-art Web-based application to meet federal and state requirements and local agency needs while increasing efficiency, maintaining data integrity, and sharing data via secure methods. SPHERE was coordinated with the Healthiest Wisconsin 2010: A Partnership to Improve the Health of the Public infrastructure objective related to electronic integrated public health data systems. SPHERE will enhance the capacity of local and state public health agencies to collect, analyze, evaluate, and report data related to program outcomes, DPH performance-based contract objectives, and state and federal performance measures. SPHERE becomes an effective voice that allows communication of current, meaningful data to state and local policy makers.”

Shari Winter
Assistant Director, Washington County Health Department, Wisconsin

 

Wisconsin's Secure Public Health Electronic Record Environment (SPHERE)(21)

Description The Bureau of Family and Community Health in the Wisconsin Division of Public Health needed a replacement application for the existing MCH Data System and Family Planning/ Reproductive Health Data System. Its system, named SPHERE, is being coordinated with the Healthiest Wisconsin 2010: A Partnership to Improve the Health of the Public (State Health Plan) infrastructure objective related to electronic integrated public health data systems and under the guidance of the WPHDSC (Wisconsin Public Health Data Steering Committee). In 2001, Wisconsin unified its development of the Health Alert Network (HAN) and the National Electronic Disease Surveillance System (NEDSS) -- to support SPHERE, its integrated public health information system.
Public Health Relevance This project has involved the Lead Team model that includes local and state partners in the design and decision-making of a program area module. It has also provided insights and experience about how the NEDSS data model applies to day-to-day operations where data is initially collected.
Type of Data Standards Employed SPHERE adopted the use the NEDSS data model and role-based security from the beginning. All the national standards incorporated into these components (security standards, message format standards such as HL-7) are part of this application.
Status of Adoption SPHERE went statewide (Wisconsin) in August 2003. There are more than 700 registered users and about 125 organizations (including local public health departments, tribal agencies, and private non-profits) that use SPHERE.
Link Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
“The development of Wisconsin's SPHERE by the Division of Public Health, Bureau of Community and Family Health in partnership with local users from the public and private sector is very important in the development of an integrated public health information system. It has been designed to document public health activities at the individual, household, community and systems level, providing us with a tool to evaluate public health interventions.”

Amy Wergin
Public Health Nurse Manager, Manitowoc County Health Department, Wisconsin;
State Co-Chair of the Wisconsin Public Health Data Steering Committee

Internet References

The following are links to other sources of information regarding public health data standards development or implementation efforts.

Endnotes

(1) North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. (January, 2003). About NAACCR [On-line], Available: http://www.naaccr.org/
(2) The Lewin Group, National Association of Health Data Organizations and the Public Health Data Standards Consortium Education Strategy Work Group.(May 2001). National Center for Health Statistics: Public Health Data Standards Consortium Education Strategy Final Report.
(3) Ibid.
(4) HIPAAdvisory (May 2000). Guide to Transactions and Code Sets Standards [On-line], Available: http://www.hipaadvisory.com/action/Compliance/Trans-CodeSetsGuide.htm
(5) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (September 5, 2003). PHIN Brochure-Public Health Information Network Messaging System (PHIN MS). [On-line], Available: http://www.cdc.gov/phin/components/index.htm
(6) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Public Health Practice Program Office. (January 23, 2002). Health Alert Network Fact Sheet [On-line], Available: http://www.phppo.cdc.gov/han/FactSheet.asp
(7) O’Carroll, Patrick. Halverson, Paul. Jones, Deborah. Baker, Edward. Northwest Public Health. University of Washington School of Public Health and Community Medicine. (Spring/Summer 2002). The Health Alert Network in Action. Spring/Summer 2002.
(8) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Public Health Practice Program Office. (January 23, 2002). Health Alert Network Fact Sheet [On-line], Available: http://www.phppo.cdc.gov/han/FactSheet.asp
(9) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Public Health Practice Program Office. (January 23, 2002). HAN/BT Jurisdictions [On-line], Available: http://www.phppo.cdc.gov/han/statemap.asp
(10) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (December 9, 2002). Overview of NEDSS [On-line], Available: http://www.cdc.gov/nedss/
(11) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (December 9, 2002). Description of the NEDSS Base System. [On-line], Available: http://www.cdc.gov/nedss/BaseSystem/NEDSSBaseSysDescription.pdf
(12) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (July 27, 2001). Updated Guidelines for Evaluating Public Health Surveillance Systems. Recommendations from the Guidelines Working Group. MMWR July 27, 2001/ 50(RR12);1-35 [On-line], Available: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5013a1.htm
(13) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (July 2000). Public Health Conceptual Data Model (PHCDM): Premiere Edition. [On-line], Available: http://www.cdc.gov/nedss/DataModels/phcdm.pdf.
(14) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (December 9, 2002). Description of the NEDSS Base System. [On-line], Available: http://www.cdc.gov/nedss/BaseSystem/NEDSSBaseSysDescription.pdf
(15) Ibid.
(16) Ibid.
(17) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Electronic Disease Surveillance System brochure on Electronic Lab Reporting.
(18) Ibid.
(19) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (December 9, 2002). National Electronic Disease Surveillance System [On-line], Available: http://www.cdc.gov/nedss/
(20) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (September 5, 2003). PHIN Brochure-National Electronic Disease Surveillance System (NEDSS) Base System (NBS). [On-line], Available: http://www.cdc.gov/phin/components/index.htm
(21) Written by Debi L. Peters, Wisconsin NEDSS Coordinator and Katherine Kvale, Wisconsin SPHERE Coordinator

Download PDF

 

View Glossary

Back to Top

Return to Previous Module

Return to Tutorial Introduction

Proceed to Next Module

 

 

 

 
 
 

Click here to review the PHDSC's Legal and Privacy Statement

 
Copyright 2006 © Public Health Data Standards Consortium - All rights reserved