|
|
Efforts to identify public health information needs,
and develop and adopt data standards to address them are surfacing at
national, state and local levels. Given increased attention to and
support of public health in light of recent threats to homeland
security, the time is now and urgent for public health to move to
electronic data standards, to recognize and address emerging threats,
and to establish a foundation for improved public health practice. In
addition, public health should take advantage of the opportunities for
action through unprecedented advancements in information technology and
computer science. (See Module 8 for more
information about public health informatics.)
In this module, national and state examples of
standards development and implementation efforts or systems relying on
data standards are described. National examples relevant to recent
public health discussion are highlighted, but are not exclusive of
national initiatives (e.g., the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention's Public Health Information Network efforts and the Public
Health Data Standards Consortium's Health Care Service: Data Reporting
guide). Each example includes an explanation of
why the standard or system is relevant to public health, the types of
standards employed and the status of standards adoption or
implementation. Data standards types include, but are not limited to,
terminology standards (e.g., code sets, classification systems), message
format standards (e.g., those mandated under the Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 for the efficient exchange of
electronic billing data), and data capture forms (e.g., the Uniform Bill
data collection form used by hospitals). (See
Module 5 for more information on types of data standards.) In
addition, implementation guides provide standardized data requirements
and content for all users of a particular data standard to ensure
consistency in implementation.
National Examples
|
North American Association
of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR) |
| Description |
The North American
Association of Central Cancer Registries, Inc. (NAACCR), is a
professional organization that develops and promotes uniform
data standards for cancer registration; provides education and
training; certifies population-based registries; aggregates and
publishes data from central cancer registries; and promotes the
use of cancer surveillance data and systems for cancer control
and epidemiologic research, public health programs, and patient
care to reduce the burden of cancer in North America.(1) |
| Public Health Relevance |
Cancer registries are
patient and disease oriented databases of information about cancer.
They provide public health organizations with health statistics and
epidemiological and surveillance data about the incidence and
treatment of cancer.(2) |
| Type of Data Standards Employed |
Types of data standards which NAACCR develops and promotes include:
Standard record layout and edit protocols for
exchange of registry data;
HL-7 message format standards for clinical
information;
Terminology standards including a data
dictionary, use of LOINC codes, evaluation of SNOMED; and
Standards for completeness, quality,
management and analysis of data.
|
| Status of Adoption |
Adherence to NAACCR
standards by states is voluntary but many hospitals participate in
the accreditation program for cancer hospitals maintained by the
American College of Surgeons. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and
End Results (SEER) Program of the National Cancer Institute and the
CDC’s National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) (together SEER
and NPCR programs collect data for the entire U.S. population)
require the collection of standard data items and codes that are
consistent with NAACCR standards.(3) |
| Link |
North American Association of Central Cancer Registries |
|
The Health Care Service:
Data Reporting Guide |
| Description |
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA)
mandates that the United States adopt national uniform standards
for electronic transactions related to health insurance
enrollment, eligibility, health care encounters and health care
claims, heath care payment and remittance advice, claims status,
referral certification and authorization, and premium payments.
In addition, HIPAA mandates standard code sets that must be used
in these transactions. Classification systems are included in
the named national code sets.
HIPAA names specific implementation guides
to provide the compliance details. These implementation guides
specify the data elements required, definitions of data
elements, technical transactions for transmission of the data,
named external code sources, acceptable internal code values, as
well as usage notes for each data element.(4)
While public health is not mandated under
HIPAA to adopt standards for electronic health care
transactions, except as payers and providers, the Public Health
Data Standards Consortium (PHDSC) member organizations agreed
that it made good sense adopting the same standards as named in
HIPAA, where appropriate. (See Module 6
for the rationale for moving to standards in public health.)
In cooperation with the Standards Development Organizations
(SDOs) and the Data Content Committees (DCCs) named in HIPAA,
the Consortium developed an implementation guide for public
health reporting of health encounters. “The Health Care Service:
Data Reporting Guide” uses a subset of the same standard (837)
used by HIPAA covered entities to submit health care encounters
and health claims. This implementation guide includes data
elements beyond those that are necessary for billing purposes,
which are designated in the implementation guides named in the
HIPAA Transactions and Codes Final Rule. It is the first
national implementation guide that specifically addresses the
information needs of public health for encounter data, including
specifications for data elements such as race and ethnicity,
county codes, and a limited set of clinical data elements. |
| Public Health Relevance |
“The Health Care
Service: Data Reporting Guide” will facilitate public health’s
ability to communicate with clinical care delivery systems,
especially to address data needs that rely on encounter data (e.g.,
hospital discharge data systems). |
| Type of Data Standards Employed |
“The Health Care
Service: Data Reporting Guide” uses the ANSI ASC X12 message format
standards for electronic data interchange (EDI). This guide uses the
health care claims standard (837) which was developed by the ANSI
ASC X12 insurance subcommittee (N).
The Health Care Service: Data Reporting Guide
primarily uses the UB data content standards maintained by the
National Uniform Billing Committee (NUBC). |
| Status of Adoption |
“The Health Care
Service: Data Reporting Guide” is available on the Washington
Publishing Company Web site. The guide number is 004050X156.
The New York State discharge data system
(SPARCS) utilized this guide in the development of their state
mandated emergency department data collection system. System design
documentation based on the "Health Care Service: Data Reporting
Guide" is available on the SPARCS
Web site. |
| Links |
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
Washington
Publishing Company |
|
Public Health Information
Network (PHIN)* |
| Description |
A cross-cutting and
unifying framework is needed to better monitor diverse data streams
for early detection of public health issues and emergencies. The
Public Health Information Network (PHIN) is this framework. Through
defined data and vocabulary standards and strong collaborative
relationships, the Public Health Information Network will enable
consistent exchange of response, health, and disease tracking data
between public health partners. PHIN uses existing systems for early
detection (BioSense), surveillance (NEDSS), secure communication
(Epi-X), analysis and interpretation, information dissemination (CDC
Website, HAN), vocabulary services and public health response
functions, including lab, outbreak and vaccine management and
administration.(5) Ensuring the security of this information is also critical as is the ability of the network to work reliably in times of national crisis. PHIN is composed of five key components: detection and monitoring, data analysis, knowledge management, alerting and response:
Detection and monitoring supports disease and
threat tracking as well as national health status indicators.
Data analysis facilitates real-time evaluation
of live data feeds transforming data into useful information for
partners at all levels of public health.
Information resources and knowledge management
provides reference resources, distance learning and decision
support.
Alerting and communications platforms transmit
emergency alerts, routine professional discussions and
collaborative activities.
Response provides management support around
guidelines, recommendations, vaccination, etc.
Creating a strong network that continues to
define shared data standards to support the exchange of key health
data is critical for a more effective and response-oriented public
health system. The Public Health Information Network will serve as
the framework supporting this new system, a system better positioned
to respond to the changing needs of public health and consequently
the nation. |
| Public Health Relevance |
A prompt and
authoritative response to public health issues and emergencies large
and small is a significant part of what defines the CDC. These
emergencies can range from outbreaks aboard cruise ships to
investigating sick buildings to monitoring the global AIDS
situation. However, the anthrax crisis highlighted a gap in the
nation’s ability to adequately identify a broader spectrum of
possible threats. Ensuring clinical, local, state and federal
agencies can seamlessly exchange health–related data is an essential
step toward addressing this gap.
Currently there are multiple systems in place
that support communications for public health labs, the clinical
community, and state and local health departments. Each has
demonstrated the importance of being able to exchange health
information. However, many of these systems operate in isolation,
not capitalizing on the potential for a cross-fertilization of data
exchange. The Public Health Information Network seeks to leverage
those systems and capitalize on that potential. |
| Type of Data Standards Employed |
The Public Health
Information Network will extend the work that has been done in the
area of infectious disease surveillance under the National
Electronic Disease Surveillance System (NEDSS). The Public Health
Conceptual Data Model that was developed as part of the NEDSS
architecture will be enhanced as the Public Health Domain
Information Model to include concepts in areas such as environmental
health, adverse medical event reporting, and other areas outside of
infectious diseases that are not adequately expressed in the current
version of the data model. The association with the HL7 Reference
Information Model (RIM) will be maintained and the development of
HL7 messages for data and information exchange will continue to be
leveraged. The use of standard vocabularies such as LOINC and SNOMED
will be enhanced through the use of other industry standard
vocabularies that may be relevant in other public health domains as
the Public Health Domain Information Model is extended. This will
continue to provide consistency in the expression of the data and
the semantics of the data elements which will facilitate data
aggregation and analysis from multiple diverse sources, since the
meaning of the data contents will be the same across multiple
systems. |
| Status of Adoption |
Since the Public
Health Information Network will leverage and extend the work that
has already been done in developing the NEDSS architecture, there
will be a foundation already in place from which to build the
functional and architectural components that are expressed in this
initiative. To date, all states have received funding for assessment
activities under NEDSS and 36 health jurisdictions have received
funding for development efforts. This has been further enhanced
under the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) emergency
preparedness and bioterrorism response initiative, which has adopted
the Public Health Information Network standards, and which provided
funding to 62 state, territory and large metropolitan health
jurisdictions in 2002. Continued funding is anticipated for this
initiative and the public health vendor community is beginning to
inquire about this architecture with an eye toward developing
products in support of public health activities that are in
compliance with the architectural standards. This type of
partnership between public health and the vendor community in
promulgating all aspects of this architecture can only support the
rapid evolution of interoperable public health systems and the
improvement in the capacity of public health to response to all
types of public health events. |
| |
*
Information about the Public Health Information Network was provided
via electronic mail by John Teeter, Associate Director, Information
Technology Architecture, Information Resources Management Office,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. February 26, 2003. |
|
“On September 11, 2002, within hours of
terrorist attacks in New York City and Washington, DC, the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued a health
alert to public health authorities in all 50 states. The alert,
sent by e-mail and fax, recommended that they heighten
surveillance for any unusual disease occurrence or increased
numbers of illnesses that might be associated with the attacks.
CDC accomplished this nationwide notification by using the
Health Alert Network (HAN) States received notification in an
average of six minutes. Twenty-four states then used their own
statewide Health Alert Networks to quickly forward the alert to
local public health officials…. State and local health officials
subsequently broadcasted information to hospitals, emergency
departments, urgent care facilities, community health nurses,
hospital and private laboratories, infection control
practitioners, law enforcement agencies, and water suppliers.”
O’Carroll, Patrick. Halverson, Paul.
Jones, Deborah. Baker, Edward. “The Health Alert Network in
Action.” Northwest Public Health. University of Washington
School of Public Health and Community Medicine. Spring/Summer
2002. |
|
Health Alert Network |
| Description |
Originating in
October 1998, the Health Alert Network is designed to build
preparedness and response capacity at the local health
department level in partnership with colleagues at the state
departments of health. Funding for HAN supports connections to
the Internet, training of the public health workforce via
distance learning systems (satellite, Internet, or both), and
the capacity to send urgent health alerts to local agencies and selected groups via information broadcast
technologies (e.g., broadcast fax services, autodialing).
In many states and localities, while HAN began as an
infrastructure to increase agency preparedness to respond to a
public health emergency, it has evolved into an integrated
information and communications system platform for all day to
day operations and programs. For example, national disease
surveillance and electronic laboratory reporting (through NEDSS)
runs on the HAN platform. |
| Public Health Relevance |
HAN increases local
and state public health agency preparedness to respond to a public
health emergency. HAN is a nationwide, integrated information and
communications system serving as a platform for distribution of
health alerts, dissemination of prevention guidelines and other
information, and distance learning, as well as supporting CDCs
bioterrorism and related initiatives.(6) |
| Type of Data Standards Employed |
The Health Alert
Network is providing local health departments with the
infrastructure and capacity as well as networking relationships with
the state health departments to eventually access and share data
electronically. It is based on three core technical capacities:
robust electronic communications capacity; capacity to receive
distance-learning offerings; and capacity to receive and broadcast
urgent health alerts.(7)
HAN is a portal through which standards-based systems such as NEDSS
can run. |
| Status of Adoption |
CDC is providing HAN
funding and technical assistance to the following recipients:
All 50 state health agencies, the District of
Columbia;
Eight territories;
Two-thirds of the nation’s counties;
Health organizations and major hospital
networks;
Three metropolitan health departments
(Chicago, County of Los Angeles Department of Health Services, and
New York City);
Five local exemplar centers for public health
preparedness (DeKalb County Board of Health, Georgia; Monroe
County Health Department, New York; and Denver Health/Denver
Public Health, Colorado; Westchester County Health Department, New
York; Lawrence Douglas County, Kansas); and
Fourteen academic and seven specialty academic
centers for public health preparedness.(8,
9)
With the inauguration of the Public Health
Information Network (PHIN) in 2003 by CDC PHIN serves as the
umbrella for the Health Alert Network (HAN), one of its many
systems working to achieve the goal of an integrated public health
system. |
| Links |
Health Alert Network (HAN) |
|
National Electronic Disease
Surveillance System (NEDSS) Initiative |
| Description |
The vision of the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) National
Electronic Disease Surveillance System (NEDSS) Initiative
(NEDSS) is to have integrated surveillance systems that can
transfer appropriate public health, laboratory, and clinical
data efficiently and securely over the Internet.(10)
The NEDSS initiative is made up of the NEDSS System
Architecture, the NEDSS Base System, and NEDSS Electronic Laboratory Reporting
System. To initiate implementation of NEDSS, states have
received funds to either develop their own systems using
specified NEDSS System Architecture and standards, or to adopt
all or a portion of the CDC-developed NEDSS Base System.(11)
The NEDSS System Architecture
electronically integrates and links together several types of
surveillance systems with the use of standard data formats; a
communications infrastructure built on principles of public
health informatics; and agreements on data access, sharing and
confidentiality.(12)
The Public Health Conceptual Data Model (PHCDM) is a major
component of the NEDSS data architecture standards. The purpose
of PHCDM is to document information needs of public health so
that the CDC, in collaboration with state and local health
departments, can establish data standards for public health,
collaborate with national health informatics standards setting
bodies to define standards for exchange of information, and
construct computerized systems that conform to established
standards for use in the management of data relevant to public
health.(13)
Data expressions are further defined in the
Public Health Logical Data Model which provides guidance on how
the data concepts captured in the Public Health Conceptual Data
Model can be implemented.
NEDSS is based on the following principles:
-
Utilization of industry standards;
Reliance on off-the-shelf software;
Internet-based secure transmission of data;
A common "look and feel" of systems;
-
Common reporting requirements; and
No requirement for specific software use.(14)
NEDSS System Architecture is designed to
integrate and replace several current CDC surveillance systems,
including the National Electronic Telecommunications System for
Surveillance (NETSS), the HIV/AIDS reporting system, the vaccine
preventable diseases and systems for tuberculosis (TB) and
infectious diseases.(15)
The NEDSS Base System is a complete
implementation of the NEDSS architecture and standards that is
made available to states as an operational system. It is a
modular platform that can be customized to meet state and
program area data needs as well as provide a secure, accurate
and efficient way for collecting and processing data needed at
the national level.(16) Currently the modules are designed
to provide functionality for surveillance purposes. In the
future, the NEDSS Base System will be expanded to include
modules that support common public health functions beyond
surveillance. The NEDSS Base System is developed by an
experienced software engineering company, Computer Sciences
Corporation (CSC), in consultation with the CDC and state
partners.
Both NEDSS and the NEDSS Base System have
electronic laboratory reporting (ELR) functionality. ELR is
designed to provide secure, automated and electronic
communication for reportable conditions between participating
state departments of health, the CDC, and external NEDSS trading
partners using national standards for electronic messaging.(17)
ELR reduces the reporting burden for clinical laboratories and
minimizes data entry for public health. |
| Public Health Relevance |
NEDSS is designed to
address the limitations of current surveillance systems which
include:(18)
- Multiple, incompatible, disease specific systems that
currently exist;
- Incomplete, inconsistently expressed and delayed data;
- Burden on health care system to report disease;
- Overwhelming volume of data to be managed by health
departments; and
- Lack of state-of-the-art information technology.
NEDSS will revolutionize public health by
gathering and analyzing information quickly and accurately. NEDSS
will help to improve the nation's ability to identify and track
emerging infectious diseases and potential bioterrorism attacks as
well as to investigate outbreaks and monitor disease trends.(19) |
| Type of Data Standards Employed |
NEDSS relies on several types of data standards:
Uniform data capture standards;
Message format standards (e.g., HL-7) for
electronic data interchange (EDI) of disease surveillance and
laboratory data; XML data exchange;
Terminology standards (e.g., LOINC, SNOMED)
Security standards.
|
| Status of Adoption |
In FY 2000, the CDC
created NEDSS with $20 million made available for this purpose.
Approximately $10 million was used to set up the necessary CDC
infrastructure, such as training, hardware, and software for the
system. The remainder was awarded to states to begin development. To
date, all states have received funds for NEDSS assessment and
planning activities. In October 2002, Version 1.0 of the NEDSS Base
System was released in several states. Currently Nebraska and South
Carolina are using Version 1.02 of the Base System. Tennessee,
Louisiana, Virginia, Indiana and Texas are in various stages of
deployment. At this time, Version 1.1 of the NEDSS Base System is
being deployed. See Exhibit 1 for states that are implementing and
installing the NEDSS Base System.(20)
With the inauguration of the Public Health Information Network (PHIN)
in 2003 by CDC, PHIN serves as the umbrella for continued work
developing and deploying the NEDSS. |
| Link |
National
Electronic Disease Surveillance System |
Exhibit 1: NEDSS Base System Sites, 2003

Source: PHIN Brochure-National Electronic
Disease Surveillance System (NEDSS) Base System (NBS), Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention accessed online 11-13-03 at
http://www.cdc.gov/phin/components/index.htm
State Example
“A dedicated lead team of state,
regional, local public health staff, and tribal representatives
developed the Secure Public Health Electronic Record Environment
(SPHERE). The vision of the SPHERE Lead Team was to design a
state-of-the-art Web-based application to meet federal and state
requirements and local agency needs while increasing efficiency,
maintaining data integrity, and sharing data via secure methods.
SPHERE was coordinated with the Healthiest Wisconsin 2010: A
Partnership to Improve the Health of the Public infrastructure
objective related to electronic integrated public health data
systems. SPHERE will enhance the capacity of local and state
public health agencies to collect, analyze, evaluate, and report
data related to program outcomes, DPH performance-based contract
objectives, and state and federal performance measures. SPHERE
becomes an effective voice that allows communication of current,
meaningful data to state and local policy makers.”
Shari Winter
Assistant Director, Washington County Health Department,
Wisconsin |
|
Wisconsin's Secure
Public Health Electronic Record Environment (SPHERE)(21) |
| Description |
The Bureau of
Family and Community Health in the Wisconsin Division of Public
Health needed a replacement application for the existing MCH
Data System and Family Planning/ Reproductive Health Data
System. Its system, named SPHERE, is being coordinated with the
Healthiest Wisconsin 2010: A Partnership to Improve the
Health of the Public (State Health Plan) infrastructure
objective related to electronic integrated public health data
systems and under the guidance of the WPHDSC (Wisconsin Public
Health Data Steering Committee). In 2001, Wisconsin unified its
development of the Health Alert Network (HAN) and the National
Electronic Disease Surveillance System (NEDSS) -- to support
SPHERE, its integrated public health information system. |
| Public Health
Relevance |
This project has
involved the Lead Team model that includes local and state
partners in the design and decision-making of a program area
module. It has also provided insights and experience about how
the NEDSS data model applies to day-to-day operations where data
is initially collected. |
| Type of Data
Standards Employed |
SPHERE adopted the use the NEDSS data model and role-based security from the beginning. All the national
standards incorporated into these components (security
standards, message format standards such as HL-7) are part of
this application. |
| Status of Adoption |
SPHERE went statewide (Wisconsin) in August 2003. There are more than 700 registered users and about 125 organizations (including local public health departments, tribal agencies, and private non-profits) that use SPHERE. |
| Link |
Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services |
|
|
| “The
development of Wisconsin's SPHERE by the Division of Public
Health, Bureau of Community and Family Health in partnership
with local users from the public and private sector is very
important in the development of an integrated public health
information system. It has been designed to document public
health activities at the individual, household, community and
systems level, providing us with a tool to evaluate public
health interventions.”
Amy Wergin
Public Health Nurse Manager, Manitowoc County Health Department,
Wisconsin;
State Co-Chair of the Wisconsin Public Health Data Steering
Committee |
|
Internet References
The following are links to other sources of
information regarding public health data standards development or
implementation efforts.
Endnotes
(1) North American Association of Central
Cancer Registries. (January, 2003). About NAACCR [On-line], Available:
http://www.naaccr.org/
(2) The
Lewin Group, National Association of Health Data Organizations and the
Public Health Data Standards Consortium Education Strategy Work
Group.(May 2001). National Center for Health Statistics: Public
Health Data Standards Consortium Education Strategy Final Report.
(3)
Ibid.
(4) HIPAAdvisory (May 2000). Guide to
Transactions and Code Sets Standards [On-line], Available:
http://www.hipaadvisory.com/action/Compliance/Trans-CodeSetsGuide.htm
(5) Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention. (September 5, 2003). PHIN Brochure-Public Health
Information Network Messaging System (PHIN MS). [On-line],
Available: http://www.cdc.gov/phin/components/index.htm
(6) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
Public Health Practice Program Office. (January 23, 2002). Health Alert
Network Fact Sheet [On-line], Available:
http://www.phppo.cdc.gov/han/FactSheet.asp
(7)
O’Carroll, Patrick. Halverson, Paul. Jones, Deborah. Baker, Edward.
Northwest Public Health. University of Washington School of Public
Health and Community Medicine. (Spring/Summer 2002). The Health Alert
Network in Action. Spring/Summer 2002.
(8)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Public Health Practice
Program Office. (January 23, 2002). Health Alert Network Fact Sheet
[On-line], Available:
http://www.phppo.cdc.gov/han/FactSheet.asp
(9)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Public Health Practice
Program Office. (January 23, 2002). HAN/BT Jurisdictions [On-line],
Available: http://www.phppo.cdc.gov/han/statemap.asp
(10)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (December 9, 2002).
Overview of NEDSS [On-line], Available:
http://www.cdc.gov/nedss/
(11)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (December 9, 2002).
Description of the NEDSS Base System. [On-line], Available:
http://www.cdc.gov/nedss/BaseSystem/NEDSSBaseSysDescription.pdf
(12)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (July 27, 2001). Updated
Guidelines for Evaluating Public Health Surveillance Systems.
Recommendations from the Guidelines Working Group. MMWR July 27,
2001/ 50(RR12);1-35 [On-line], Available:
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5013a1.htm
(13)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (July 2000). Public
Health Conceptual Data Model (PHCDM): Premiere Edition. [On-line],
Available:
http://www.cdc.gov/nedss/DataModels/phcdm.pdf.
(14)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (December 9, 2002).
Description of the NEDSS Base System. [On-line], Available:
http://www.cdc.gov/nedss/BaseSystem/NEDSSBaseSysDescription.pdf
(15) Ibid.
(16) Ibid.
(17)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Electronic Disease
Surveillance System brochure on Electronic Lab Reporting.
(18)
Ibid.
(19)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (December 9, 2002). National
Electronic Disease Surveillance System [On-line], Available:
http://www.cdc.gov/nedss/
(20) Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention. (September 5, 2003). PHIN Brochure-National
Electronic Disease Surveillance System (NEDSS) Base System (NBS).
[On-line], Available:
http://www.cdc.gov/phin/components/index.htm
(21)
Written by Debi L. Peters, Wisconsin NEDSS Coordinator and Katherine
Kvale, Wisconsin SPHERE Coordinator
|
|